Tell us what’s on your mind? 
- This topic has 2,116 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 hours, 33 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
About the special election status: My cellular died last week. Your participation texts cannot come through until I transfer my data to a new phone.
Because of the Board’s recent action, I will not disclose the shareholder count calling for a special election until I have both – the total count and the names of a new slate of candidates for the next election. I have heard tales of verbal intimidation by the current ‘agents’ and therefore will withhold that information until the last minute. I had hoped to select 3 members of the current Board however, due to circumstances, it will be just 2 members of the existing Board.
Ron
Ron,
Will you please update us on the special election status.
We need a healthy mix of board members so the COOP can benefit from their strengths. [In my opinion] we need 4 old board members because they have the EXPERIENCE and WISDOM about this COOP. To balance that out, we need 5 of the current board members.
The main problem (there are several by the way) with the current board is they are inexperienced. As a result, we can see management under-performing and improperly managing resources.
One Voice agrees to the mix of experienced and inexperienced members but we will never support the old Board members holding a majority vote. Further, One Voice prefers all Board members to be factual residents – not investors – not subletters – not brokers. We choose to support shareholders who actually live here and are without a conflict of interest.
The issue right now is not Chandra or any previous Board. That ship has sailed. What we now need to do is select a new competent slate of candidates with no outside ties to run against the present Board. This will enable us to run a campaign aimed directly at the performance of those current members and the current management. The narrower our focus, the better our chances.
- In response to the post @ 5:23 pm on 3/1… I am in no way representing One Voice, however, I would like to give my opinion on chandra. 1. My view of him is that he is an egoistic, wicked, evil, cruel, self centered poor excuse for a human being. 2. As a manager, he lacked empathy and humility, and caused a great deal of pain and suffering to many shareholders, who viewed him as an emotional abuser. 3. The answer is absolutely NOT, emphatically NO, and unequivocally NO way in hell.
3 questions for 1 voice
1 what is their view of Chandra?
2 what is their view on chandra as a manager?
3 would they support bringing him back as manager if given chance
We worked with ParkCity4Change because we wanted the following:
Transparency
(1) What is Z’s interested in this coop if she is not a shareholder?
(2) Why was AKAM chosen long before the new board was assembled?
(3) Why did R shut down the Whatsapp group soon after being elected?
(4) Why did 2 board members quit shortly after being elected?Fairness
(1) Why are some brokers’ applications being rejected while others are fed to management?
(2) Are there personal / professional relationships within the management?Lazy Staff
(1) Why can we no longer drop off our maintenance to the local management office?
(2) Why is it difficult getting staff on the phone when calling the office?
(3) How can you serve on the board if you’re not physically here for meetings?Above are questions circulating the new Whatsapp group.
We want a new board with the interest of shareholders first.
Did you not want this? You have been begging for years for Chandra out. People were giddy when the new board came in, it was a big party? So what happened?
Re: February 28, 2022 at 9:49 pm
This group has been around before Chandra was fired.
Bottom line: AKAM and the gang have to go because they didn’t follow through on their election promises. Additionally, we’ve spoken to many shareholders and they are upset with several recent events.
Please pay attention to the next election and join the Whatsapp group. Ron is doing great work here. The Whatsapp group supplements what he’s doing.
NOTE TO ALL –
We need 25% of the outstanding shares to demand a special shareholders meeting to remove some or all of the current Board of Directors.
Please text me with your bldg number and apt number so that I can begin to tally the number of shares we have and how many more are needed
Texts only to 718.664.3725
Ron – One Voice
Note from One Voice – we cannot allow use of actual names when the writer says bad things about a specific person.
This is a FREE site but there are still laws we must adhere to. Sometimes, when a name is used and an allegation is made against them I will insert (allegedly) into your comment.
For the record, this site recognizes the word “crook” as a potentially “dishonest” person.
The safest thing for anyone to do is to begin your post with the words “In my opinion”.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion and it won’t breach any laws.
In my opinion – old manager is a crook and dictator who has mental problems. No one canceled the boomerang. He only got a small portion of it. The big one is coming. But, thanks God, he is not here and we need to worry about other crooks who occupied the office led by attorney who has no idea where she got herself into. We need fair election to bring good people on the board before it’s too late.
Why did this group only pop up when Shandra left office? Now its got a whole page praising Shandra and forgetting how things used to be
Nothing will change unless we convince apathetic shareholders that their investment in Park City is at stake with the continuance of the current situation. Maybe something good will come out of this if a new and competent board gets elected. And whomever runs, they should insist on an independent election company. Definitely not Honest (?) Ballot which was chosen by the current board members.
Let’s kick this horrible intimidating attorney the hell out of park city.we need park city to be a great place again. Make this new election count.!!
