Tell us what’s on your mind? 
- This topic has 2,121 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 hours, 33 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I’m not taking anyone’s side on this but we do need to apply logic.
The original elevators were installed when these buildings were built in 1954.
There may have been major repairs when the buildings were converted to a cooperative in 1980.
The original Offering Plan has pages devoted to the condition of each building and needed repairs.
The elevators might have been renovated at that time – renovated, not replaced.
The elevators were repaired over the years and finally replaced somewhere around the year 2000.
So now to the logic.
If you bought a new car in 2000 – 22 years ago – why would you expect your car dealer or mechanic to have parts for your car in stock today?
The issue with the elevators is why did it take so long for outages to be resolved. The previous company wasn’t that great, but the new company has taken much longer to fix problems. There would not be a problem with the supply chain if the company had adequate inventory of parts to make repairs. No one should be against refinancing an elevator project assuming that such project is necessary. Shareholders should receive from the Board and management what is needed and why before such a major undertaking occurs.
Looking to contact PARKCITY SHAREHOLDERS.
Some tenant shareholders say they receive emails and texts from a person or group – PARKCITY SHAREHOLDERS.
No one from that group has ever contacted me, or to my knowledge, have posted comments to this website but they are more than welcome to do so.
This website is intended for all “tenants” whether they are shareholders or not.
If PARKCITY SHAREHOLDERS chooses to remain anonymous – that’s totally OK as there are no tracking programs built into this website.
The only “IF” is when comments are obviously bold lies or are intended to personally defame someone. That’s a liability issue for me.
I will, and do, delete misleading comments and anything that reeks of bull manure citing the greatness of the current -or past- Board of Directors.
Otherwise, please to add me to your distribution list. I am Parkcityonevoice@yahoo.com -or- text to 718.664.3725.
I really don’t like texting. Texting is like an immediate interruption to my day whereas emails are “there” when I decide to go online.
Ron Migut
Also surprised the conversation here switched to “when will the elevators be done” given this group was against financing for that project.
I’m not Steve but I can answer.
Renovating an office and redoing elevators are two different projects that require a different amount of time, planning, and resources.
Renovating an office is a simpler affair that can be immediately done. There is no reason to wait until the elevators are done to start a new project.
Elevators also will cost A LOT more than renovating an office.
Hi Steve,
Question for you can you please answer since you are so great with your comment below.
Why is it okay that David can have his new management office in 9707 fixed and renovated, before our elevators?????? Tenants livelihood come first! Not the renovation for property manager. That should have came last!
Please respond.FYI – I deleted the Steve comment. There is no Steve but there is a Zarina and there’s a consistency in the way she writes. Ron
I’ve lived in multiple coops before and never seen stuff like what’s happening here.
In answer to the comment I just deleted –
1. You can find where they are cheating and stop them.
2. You can find where they are stealing and have the District Attorney prosecute them.
ps: I deleted your source from my One Voice email list
Ron
If the board is so unpopular it should not be hard to get signatures for a special meeting
Get to work everyone
And if the signatures are not collected it just shows this group probably isnt as powerful as people are saying
Over the years, elevators would occasionally break down and would be fixed within days. But now, elevators have been out of commission for weeks. The present Board or lawyer or Zarina has saddled us with a new elevator company which is using the excuse of supply chain problems for having parts. A competent company has an inventory of parts on hand. And now the current Board members have been reelected. By whom? I hope that anyone that voted for these people thinks about their vote as they have to climb up the many flights while their elevator is out.
To answer this post. Why you don’t call OSHA and the city to start investing because this is beyond board members now:
September 16, 2022 at 2:26 pm
HI, HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE THAT NONE OF THE NEW CANDIDATES GOT ELECTED. WHEN WE WERE ELECTED LAST YEAR , WE HAD A MEETING WITH EMMA, AND SHE WAS TELLING US THAT EVERY YEAR SOMEONE FROM THE BOARD HAS TO LEAVE AND GET A NEW CANDIDATES SO BOARD WOULD REFRESH EVERY YEAR. WHAT HAPPENS NOW IS SAME THING THAT WAS WITH CHANDRA. EVERYTHING IS ORCHESTRATED BY EMMA. SHE IS REALLY REALLY SNEAKY AND BAD PERSON . THIS IS HER BREAD AND BUTTER . SHE IS HERE FOREWER. ZARINA IS MAKING MONEY, HER BOYFRIEND HAS SIX FIGURE JOB. EVERYONE HAPPY. WE OPENED BOX OF PANDORA WHEN WE LET THESE PEOPLE . OUR COOP IS GOING INTO HELL. ELEVATORS STILL NOT WORKING . ROACHES ARE ALL OVER .
IS THERE ANY WAY MAYBE TO GET SIGNATURES OF MAJORITY SHAREHOLDER AND SIMPLY RELEASE CURRENT BOARD? IF THERE IS LETS ORGANIZE THAT AND WE CAN DO EASY WAY.THANK YOU
YES! There is a way to remove some, or all, members of the Board. It would take approximately 330 shareholders representing AT LEAST 82,500 shares to sign a demand letter to the co-op Secretary to hold a Special Meeting “for the purpose of removing members of the Board”.
The Secretary must set a date and time for such a meeting and send a notice of same to every shareholder of record. This is stated in both our By-Laws and the Business Corporation Laws (BCL)
BCL 716 can be found in the DOCUMENTS section of this website.
In part, it reads “An officer elected by the shareholders may be removed, with or without cause, only by vote of the shareholders”
Ron
From what I heard, Ron was given an opportunity with the existing board, they considered working with him, but he was uncooperative and wanted things his way only or no way at all. I don’t know to what degree this is true or not, but hopefully Ron can provide some insight on what happened?
This is Ron hoping those who know me can recognize that comment is another piece of Zarina bullshit.
As for disagreeing with the Board – my attorney wrote Emma that I wanted to view the Minutes of the Board meetings and co-op contracts.
After a lot of her bullshit, Emma placed these restrictions on our request –
My attorney and I could look at the Minutes and contracts.
We could not copy them.
We could not make any notes of what we read.
And if I told anyone about what I read, Emma would take me to court for violating HER restrictions and sue me for the time spent in providing the information to me (to be looked at). All of that is contrary to our By Laws and the BCL 624.
My attorney and I decided to wait until after the election in the hope of dealing with a new and more favorable Board. Now, at the meeting, Emma spoke of changing the By Laws and I am personally certain that she will want to change any By Law that gives shareholders any rights to co-op records.
My attorney and I are now waiting to see if the new candidates are going to challenge the election in court.
Ron, you almost won the election. Did you see how many people voted for you?
Yes Zarina, I know and I anticipated votes for me would be in the lower tier of election results.
When we all saw the extent of the pathetic acts that your Board was doing to defame all of the new candidates (your yellow letters under the doors) and lying through your teeth to infer that the new candidates wanted to bring back Chandra – or would drop the litigation against Chandra if they won – I ceased doing anything more than posting my BIO on the bulletin boards – just as often as your board’s team was ripping them down.
Your board acted in absolute filth and disgrace and made the shareholders openly aware that you were so desperate to win that there must be hidden collusion by the board with others.
Ron Migut
Not too sure about anything this board says. At the meeting, at least 7 shareholders brought their green ballot to vote in person and they were told they already voted by proxy. When the ballot people pulled out the proxy to show them, all of the signatures on the proxies were forged and all proxies had votes for the current board.
So now even if you never signed any of the ‘at your door’ proxies – and if you want an honest vote – you have to bring your green ballot to the meeting. You don’t have to stay for the meeting but you really should. Just register in person or give your green ballot to someone you trust to be handed in and make sure your proxy is dated for the date of the Annual Meeting.
About the By-Laws. Some people asked why some things in the By-Laws can’t be changed. I think it had to do with if a board member leaves why can’t the person with the next highest votes at the election automatically move up to be on the board. The lawyer blamed the By-Laws and said she would look to see “what can’t be changed”. That was not an answer. It indicated she wants to change many things. That’s very wrong. Don’t give your life away to her sneakiness.
People here’s your answer –NOTHING HAS TO BE CHANGED. The board just has to submit an AMENDMENT to the By-Laws that says in the event of a vacancy on the 9 member board that the vacancy will be filled by the 10th person holding the most elected shares. We will still have to vote for the AMENDMENT but it should read just as simple as that. Be very cautious if they want to change more things. Changing By Laws is not good for us – you saw the cheating done during the election and you can just imagine what they will try to do by making By-Laws changes.
An Amendment just to fill any vacant seat on the board using the existing election results is all that is needed.
Don’t be fooled by more of their talking about changing the By Laws, It is the By Laws that factually stop the Board from becoming dictators.
This is the one of the longest times that the elevator has been out in 98-20. Looking at this website, it looks like elevators have been out in other buildings as well. Supposedly it’s because the new elevator company is having trouble getting parts. Why haven’t they had spare parts available in their inventory. Not very happy with this new company.
