Tell us what’s on your mind? 
- This topic has 2,111 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 27 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
The staff is being mistreated to open up spots for friends and family of Zarina and Co. for kickbacks
maintenance staff is being abused and set up for termination and ALL some care about is how many apartments are for sale ?
From public information it looks like we have 35 units listed for sale in the complex and only 5 closings in the last 6 months. All of Rego park has 275 listings of which 200 are coop apartments. This means 1 in 6 of the apartments in all of rego park for sale are in our complex, and clearly only 5 people were foolish enough to buy a unit almost year to date. The 5 families who were able to get out are very lucky.
How about a fact and truth.
See August 17th comment.
FACT- the Financial Report shows the 2022 exterminating cost is $40,000 MORE than it was for year 2021.
Now your turn – TRUTH….. ?????
Just writing comments like “get your facts straight” are worthless unless you state which facts and what is the truth. And if you have positive things to say, let’s hear them as well.
So many negativity here unbelievable!
instead of blaming the board and management and draw quick conclusions, get your facts straight.
Our co-op office has a different kind of “A.I.”
– it’s not Artificial Intelligence, it’s “Actually Ignorant”
Other buildings, co-ops, condos, rentals have a pet fee monthly. This covers the damage and clean up of people’s pets if someone is a slob.
There are four washing machines out in 9805 ( including one of the two large ones). As bad as Sebco was we never had 4 machines out at once. I called the office to report it and I was asked – “you mean in the common area”. DUH! Where else would the machine be but in the laundry room? I was also asked which ones. I told her just send the guy from the company, I didn’t take numbers or a picture. The plugs are pulled, he will figure it out. The maintenance staff had to see the plugs pulled, why didn’t they report this?
PRICELESS!
If your dog poops on the grass – the co-op’s going to fine you $100.00 You, me, and others aren’t going to pay $100.00
We’ll use the excuses “not my dog – must be someone else”; “I don’t care what your camera video taped – prove it was me”.
So, in time, it’ll go to court and because our co-op is a legal corporation … a lawyer must represent us in court. So Emma will get several hundred dollars to represent the co-op on a $100 dog-poop fine.
If the board had common sense (they don’t) they’d set the fee at $25.00. A guilty person is more likely to pay it and apologize and, most likely, they won’t let their dog do it again. The same applies to the $100 or $200 fine for improper disposal of garbage.
Anyone else remember Emma telling everyone that before any fines are made, all the shareholders will have to vote on it first. LIAR!
We need a new board. We need a thinking board. We need an honest board. We need a board that communicates.
Did anyone notice that Exterminating for 2022 is forty-thousand dollars ($40,000.00) more than 2021???
I wonder whose relative the board hired for that job??
PATHETIC MISINFORMATION IN CO-OP FINANCIAL REPORT
Haven’t read it all but Page 9 – Note 1 reflects absolute incompetence.
Our buildings might have been certified for occupancy in 1953 BUT WE DID NOT BECOME A COOPERATIVE UNTIL JUNE 5, 1980.
That is the date on our Certificate of Incorporation. A copy can be found in the DOCUMENTS section of this website.
It’s looking like people in power are pulling information out of the wrong end of their anatomy.
—- and just to top this off, as of today (August 14, 2023) the New York State Division of Corporations still shows Chandra K. Jain as the co-op Chief Executive Officer at 9805 63rd Road
Ron Migut
We shareholders pay for the lawsuits while lawyer Emma Lupo and her firm get the money.
So if you look at the last page of financial statements I have never been so appalled the enormous amounts of lawsuits. I don’t understand what type of rowdy people we have running the board and management that there’s a whole page of lawsuits. Who’s paying for these lawsuits? The shareholders? Or the people who are starting the fights with those people are suing us. Why do we have to for people to who like to fight in our management. This is disgusting!
A “slate of candidates” doesn’t mean that you have to vote for all the candidates. It means that you have a better chance of electing at least some of the candidates that are not presently on the board. Individuals can only do so much to get elected while a group of candidates can coordinate in getting a greater number of votes. Furthermore, the present board members will go around getting proxies as a slate and will then all be reelected while no individual opposition members will have the same strength of numbers.
