Share your thoughts
Tell us what’s on your mind?
Feel free to add your own comments below but note that they can be viewed by anyone.
If you prefer confidentiality of your comment, or opinion, or complaint, then you can register and sign in with confidence as a member of the Park City ONE VOICE Tenants Association.

Post Comment
Click on the numbers to navigate to older replies. There are 15 posts per page.
Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,109 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #855 Reply
    Guest

      Unfortunately I work evenings, I would love to hear a honest recap of the meeting. Thank you

      #854 Reply
      Guest

        If you’re reading this today – July 26th – please show up at tonight’s shareholder meeting at the swimming pool area at 7 pm.

         

        There are many questions to ask – why is the attorney the meeting moderator? how much is she being paid to do it? why isn’t the Board or Akam manager the moderator”

         

        How much has the attorney been paid since the new Board was elected?

         

        Why did they cancel the June elections when they had no power to amend or repeal the By Laws?

        #853 Reply
        Guest

          Zarina can not legally attend the meeting since she’s not a shareholder.  As for new candidates, there are several people that have never run before that have indicated that they would run in a new election, including one with a legal background.  We just need a legitimate election and shareholder involvement.  The number of people attending this Tuesday’s meeting will be the first indiction of whether we are dealing with a concerned shareholder populous or an apathetic one.

          #852 Reply
          Guest

            Zarina and her lawyer run the complex, it is only reasonable they present

            #851 Reply
            Guest

              We did NOT elect a lawyer. We elected 9 shareholders (now 5 or 6 left). If they are not going to represent us at this meeting then we need to do the special election to throw them all out and get rid of the not-elected lawyer who seems to be running our co-op. We need to have a show of hands of who else is willing to be on the board. THROW ALL THE USELESS TRASH OUT!

              #850 Reply
              Guest

                Seriuosly?  You want Rose or “Navid” to be the primary speaker at next weeks meeting? WHY?

                Do you really need more proof of their babbling incompetence?

                #849 Reply
                Guest

                  In two years we Will be billed and all the charges will appear suddenly. Taking a mortgage that is more than half of what we already have and also in the time of the worst interest rates. Get ready we are going for bankruptcy. If you are worried about the value of your apartments make sure we fight the new board out!!!

                  #848 Reply
                  Guest

                    At the meeting we need to ask if the co-op lawyer is under any contract as to how long we are stuck with her. We should ask how much the co-op has paid her since October. We should also ask why she is hosting this meeting instead of the property manager or board president like it was done when either Chandra or Louis would hold these meetings in the past. And is “David’s” assistant Scott paid by Akam or the co-op – if by the co-op what is his experience. If by Akam are they absorbing his salary under the original contract or has Akam charged us more for someone doing the manager’s job?????

                    #847 Reply
                    Guest

                      Louis and Lalit resigned the first week, Arthur resigned a few months later and Renee either resigned or was forced off last month.

                      #846 Reply
                      Guest

                        Can you advsie which board members resigned? They were so damm excited to s-it on the old board and now they have already run for the hills?

                        #845 Reply
                        Guest

                          Thanks Ron that is great news. Let’s organize to call a Special Meeting!

                          #844 Reply
                          Guest

                            Hopefully the board members that resigned will attend the meeting to let us know what illegal actions the remaining board members have been up to.

                            #843 Reply
                            Guest

                              The Board ILLEGALLY removed Article 1 Section 1 from our By Laws. That article covers annual shareholders meetings and election of new Board members.

                              The Board cited their authority to remove By Laws Article 1 – concerning the annual meeting and elections – under By Laws Article X Section 2. BUT WHAT THEY OVERLOOKED WAS THE LAST SENTENCE OF ARTICLE X SECTION 3 WHICH READS:

                               

                              “anything herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding, so long as as any Unsold Shares are issued and outstanding, these By-Laws may not be altered, amended, repealed or added to without the unanimous consent of all shareholders.”

                               

                              If the Board Members or the co-op attorney or Akam Management performed due diligence – they would have found the the original Sponsor holds title to 9 apartments – 3,497 Unsold Shares.

                              My attorney has informed the co-op attorney of that this afternoon.

                              Therefore the Board’s action was illegal.  What is LEGAL is for us to call for a Special Meeting for the removal of Rose Markov and at least one other Board Member.

                              In accordance with our By Laws, by shareholder vote, we can demand their removal “with or without cause” and we should make a demand at the July 26th meeting to schedule a prompt Special Meeting for the removal of Board officers [see By Laws Article II Section 4 – second paragraph].

                               

                              Ron Migut

                               

                               

                               

                               

                              #842 Reply
                              Guest

                                Rose does not run the complex except in name, why would she run the meeting?

                                #841 Reply
                                Guest

                                  I agree we the actual shareholders need to stand up for our homes and future security. WE ARE SHAREHOLDERS they must work for our best interest.  We have sat idly by and watch them do what they want. We need to get together and oust them and for those current board members who stand in the background YOU TOO will be held responsible for any all illegalities.
                                  Also why is the attorney leading the meeting????Why isn’t David or Rose leading the meeting?  Again it will cost us a couple of thousands for the attorney to lead the meeting and feed us lies. Wake up people!

                                Click on the numbers to navigate to older replies. There are 15 posts per page.
                                Viewing 15 posts - 1,726 through 1,740 (of 2,109 total)